In the quiet hum of classrooms across America, a new challenge has emerged, one that would have been unthinkable a generation ago: the ubiquitous presence of cell phones. Should schools ban them outright, collecting devices at the door? Allow them during lunch but not in class? Or perhaps trust teachers to set their own rules? The questions are endless, the debates heated, but the answers remain elusive. As a psychologist who has spent decades studying human behavior, I’m struck by a glaring gap in this conversation: we lack the data to know what actually works.

‍
This is not a trivial matter. Cell phones are not just gadgets; they are portals to distraction, social connection, and, sometimes, distress. Yet, as schools grapple with how to manage them, they’re often flying blind, guided by instinct rather than evidence. That’s why educators need to gather the data we need to make informed decisions about school phone policies. This isn’t about picking sides in a culture war—it’s about understanding what best supports students’ learning, relationships, and well-being.

‍
The research we have is thin. Studies on phone policies are often small, relying on snapshots of a few schools, and their findings are mixed. Some suggest phones harm academic performance and mental health; others find no clear effect. Meanwhile, pressure is mounting. State legislatures are pushing for bans, with some mandating phones be locked away all day. A recent National Centre for Education Statistics poll found most school leaders believe phones undermine attention and achievement. Educators, surveyed by the National Education Association, lean toward strict prohibitions, while parents and students are split—some crave tighter rules, others want access for emergencies. What unites them is frustration: no one knows which policies deliver the best outcomes.

‍
The debate often gets stuck in a false binary—ban phones or allow them. But reality is messier. Schools experiment with everything from “bell-to-bell” bans to “away for the day” rules, from locking pouches to teacher discretion. Enforcement varies widely, and a policy that looks good on paper can falter in practice. Without systematic data, we’re left guessing.
By pairing insights with data on outcomes like test scores and school climate, we can pinpoint what works.